What the Court is saying is that the government is likely to suffer irreparable harm from being prevented from implementing a flagrantly unconstitutional policy that threatens to render an untold number of children stateless

David Noll (david.noll.org): i'm not going to post anything more about Trump v. CASA because it is not the most important thing in the world, but I respectfully submit that this paragraph alone justifies all the derision directed at the Court and Justice Barrett.
For non-lawyers, she is saying that the government (by which she means executive branch) is ***irreparably harmed*** by not being able to strip the citizenship of children born in the United States to undocumented parents.
To spell it out still further, she's saying that if Stephen Miller's minions can't strip the citizenship of American citizens ***now***, the executive branch will be harmed in a way that courts can't later remedy. That's completely gratuitous. the court could have prohibited nationwide injunctions while still finding that the government hadn't shown irreparable harm in this case. And it's so transparently racist, and so transparently false, that it warrants viewing this opinion alongside Trump v. United States and Trump v. Hawaii, whatever your thoughts on the scope of district courts' remedial authority.